Why Is It Important to Distinguish Legal and Equitable Interests Where Title Is Unregistered

While a legal title focuses on the duties of the owner, the fair title refers to the enjoyment of the property. Fair title is the advantage that the buyer can enjoy when he becomes the rightful owner. Just ownership is not “true property.” In other words, a person with just title could not argue in court that he or she was the rightful owner or owner of the property. True ownership requires legal title. However, fair title gives the person more consistent control over the property. That`s right – a fair title may be more important than a legal title. At the end of this development, there was only one person against whom it would not be fair to enforce the rights of the beneficiary: someone who buys the legal estate unaware that it is a trust, even though he has done all the relevant research; That is, to use the technical term, the buyer in good faith of the legal discount for value without notice. Fair title and legal title can often overlap when it comes to a trust. Dividing title to a property between different people can be a good idea if the owner has more than one beneficiary. One person may have the right to receive property while another person may have rights regarding the benefits and use of the property after the death or death of the owner. The security may go to a trustee for a certain period of time, while the equity security goes to another beneficiary who receives a security after a certain date. Legal interest is property that can be enforced by law. An owner who has a legal interest in an asset can take legal action if another party attempts to override their ownership rights.

It is known that the person who has a legal interest in the assets has full ownership of the asset and has all the rights and powers to take legal action to secure ownership of the asset. The main advantage of a legal interest in an asset is the fact that they have unlimited recourse in case of infringement of their property rights. ⇒Once a just right has been defeated by the darling of equity, it can no longer survive against someone who is not the darling of equity (Wilkes v Spooner [1911]). Other rights cannot be protected until a judicial declaration or decision on the land register is made on the basis of a claim and proof of relevant interests or rights. Equity shall be deemed to exist where that party has a financial interest in the asset in question. A suitable interest holder may enjoy the assets without having actual legal title to the asset. The party with the reasonable interest may benefit indirectly from the increase in the value of the asset. Any party with a reasonable interest in an asset cannot make any financial gain (usually in the form of appreciation) unless legal title/interest in the asset is acquired. Fair interest holders are required to comply with the terms and conditions set out in agreements and contracts. However, the main advantage for fair interest holders is the opportunity to obtain significant financial benefits after acquiring the security and selling the assets. A bona fide buyer for the value of a legal estate in a country that had no knowledge of fair law.

⇒ Some other useful legal resources on unregistered land rights: If the disclaimer relates only to an interest in part of the registered title, it should be marked separately. Despite the fact that both represent a sense of ownership of an asset, legal interests and just interests are very different. Legal interests are when a person owns an asset and can legally enforce their rights to the asset. Cheap interest is when a person can profit from the use of the asset without legally owning it. The following example clearly explains the differences between equitable interest and legal interest. Amy has agreed to purchase a house from Daniel under a contract whereby Amy (the buyer) pays the price of the house in instalments and once the price is paid in full, Daniel (the seller) will transfer the deed of ownership of the house to Amy. In this scenario, Amy has the right interest in the house as she can live in the house and enjoy it, but has no legal rights over her. Until Amy pays the balance in full, Daniel will hold the legal interest on the house, and once Amy makes full payment, legal ownership will pass to her. In the event that the property has increased in value between the time the contract was concluded and the time of the last payment, Amy can benefit from this capital gain.